SCSS XTABS/DATA REDUCTION as against Conflict Resolution

From InterSciWiki
Revision as of 11:34, 22 September 2008 by Douglas R. White (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

SCSS XTABS/DATA REDUCTION: Marc Ross as against Ericksen's Conflict Resolution (Kin group vengeance)

Karen Paige Ericksen and Heather Horton. 1992. "Blood Feuds": Cross-Cultural Variations in Kin Group
Vengeance. Cross-Cultural Research 26(1-4): 57-85
Statehood Index
Statehood/NonState Paige
763 
767 (No) Conflict (Social or Political) in the Local Community 
858 Subsistence Type - Ecological Classification
891 Internal War (Wheeler)
1648 Internal War (Embers)

Test against:

Legitimacy of Kin group vengeance
    18  . = Missing data
    38	  1 Moral Imperative
    14	  2 Most Appropriate
    18	  3 Circumstantial
    20	  4 Last Resort
    63	  5 Formal Adjudication Only
    15	  6 Individual Self-Redress
Target of kin group vengeance
    18	  . = Missing data
    36	  1 Moral Imperative 35?
    23	  2 Most Appropriate
    24	  3 Circumstantial   23? #185 Tehuelche coded 3 contradicts code above of 6
Combo: Target of kin group vengeance
    27	  . = Missing data
    36	  1 Moral Imperative 35?
    23	  2 Most Appropriate
    23	  3 Circumstantial   23? #185 Tehuelche coded 3 contradicts code above of 6
    63	  5 Formal Adjudication Only
    14	  6 Individual Self-Redress


POLITICAL DECISION MAKING AND CONFLICT

Marc Ross, 1983. Political Decision Making and Conflict: Additional

    Cross-Cultural Codes and Scales. Ethnology 22: 169-192.

STDS30.DAT

756.  (Low) Political Role Differentiation: Full Time Specialists and their
      Differentiation from Others in the Society (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
    96    . = Missing data
    18    1 = Highly differentiated by wealth, special titles or life style
    10    2 = Moderately differentiated
    11    3 = Somewhat wealthier but share much of life style by age, gender
     7    4 = Same life style, may be older and have somewhat more prestige
    18    5 = Few exist but leadership roles present, wealthier than others
    15    6 = Few exist but leadership roles present, same life style (as #4)
    11    7 = None exist, no permanent leadership roles
757.  Political and Religious Differentiation
   103    . = Missing data
    23    1 = Consider overlap between political and religious leaders
    30    2 = Some overlap
    30    3 = Distinct
758.  Local Community Leadership Selection: Basis
    96    . = Missing data
    21    1 = Kinship; highly constrained
    25    2 = Kinship; broad choice within group
    31    3 = Non-hereditary, personal characteristics involved
    13    4 = Informal, shifts across situations
759.  Perceptions of Political Leaders' Power as seen by Society
    96    . = Missing data
    24    1 = Very powerful
    29    2 = Somewhat powerful, often variable across leaders, situations
    37    3 = Limited
760.  Perceptions of Political Leaders' Benevolence as seen by Society
   120    . = Missing data
    16    1 = Capricious and arbitrary, power used to further own interests
    13    2 = Neither particularly malevolent nor benevolent in
              use of power
    37    3 = Basically benevolent, working in interest of entire community
761.  Checks on Leaders' Power
   100    . = Missing data
     5    1 = Few, or those which exist not invoked very often
    24    2 = Checks exist which seem to make leaders sensitive to populace
    38    3 = Leaders carefully secure substantial support before taking
              action
    19    4 = No leaders act independently lest their community backing lost
762.  (No) Removal of Leaders who are incompetent or disliked (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
   109    . = Missing data
    11    1 = No way other than rebellion or popular uprisings
    18    2 = Institutionalized means invoked occasionally, possibly by elites
    30    3 = Not removed in formal manner but lose influence and are ignored
    18    4 = No formal leadership, loss of power when support diminishes
763.  (Low) Leaders' Exercise of Authority (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
    99    . = Missing data
    24    1 = Frequently act independently and make authoritative decisions
    26    2 = Make relatively few decisions on own without consultation
    37    3 = Use persuasion to help organized and structure group action
764.  (Few) Decision Making Bodies: How most decisions are made (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
    98    . = Missing data
    23    1 = Individual(s), perhaps with advice of few advisors
    16    2 = Individual(s), working with an elite council
    14    3 = Individual(s), working with a broad based council
    19    4 = Broad based community council
    16    5 = Few explicit decisions, some made by community at large
765.  (Low) Political Participation: Range of Community Decision Making, or extent
      to which community control is exercised over different areas of life
      through collective decision making, which may be of a formal or informal
      nature. (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
    98    . = Missing data
    26    1 = Collective decisions impinge on many aspects of people's lives
    18    2 = Collective decisions impinge on a moderate number of areas
    25    3 = Collective decisions impinge on few aspects of people's lives
    19    4 = Minimal collective decisions which impinge on people's lives
766.  (Low) Political Participation: Extensivity of Adult Participation in Areas
      where collective Decision Making present (VAR LABEL REVERSED) .
   102    . = Missing data
    13    1 = Widespread: decision making forums open to all adults and
              involvement is relatively great
    31    2 = High or some: widespread for some groups, but exclusion of
              others on the basis of gender, age, or kinship status
    24    3 = Moderate: some consultation present but low input from community
    16    4 = Low or non-existent: Leaders make most decisions and
              involvement of average person highly limited or absent
767.  (No) Conflict (Social or Political) in the Local Community (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
    96    . = Missing data
     4    1 = Endemic: a reality of daily existence (e.g., physical
              violence, feuding, bitter factionalism)
    20    2 = High: Conflict present but not a pervasive aspect of daily
              life
    46    3 = Moderate: Disagreements and differences do not result in high
              violence or severe disruption
    20    4 = Mild or rare
768.  (No) Conflict between Communities of the Same Society (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
    97    . = Missing data
    25    1 = Endemic: High physical violence, feuding, and/or raiding
              occur regularly
    23    2 = Moderately High, often involving physical violence
    21    3 = Moderate: Disputes may occur regularly but tendency to
              manage them in a more or less peaceful manner
    20    4 = Mild or rare
769.  Conflict Management in Local Community: Dominant Mode
    98    . = Missing data
    31    1 = Conflicting parties encouraged to find a solution on their own
    27    2 = Conflicting parties easily draw new parties in but pressures
              for resolving disputes using informal mechanisms
    30    3 = Authorities often get involved and work to achieve a settlement
770.  (No) Resort to Physical Force by Disputants in settling disputes, Exclusive
      of Police or institutionalized force, (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
    96    . = Missing data
    34    1 = Often used
    32    2 = Sometimes used
    24    3 = Rarely or never used
771.  (No) Mediation/Negotiation/Arbitration: Third parties in disputes, unable to
      impose a binding decision, but may facilitate settlement (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
    98    . = Missing data
    57    1 = Often used (to settle disputes)
    19    2 = Sometimes used
    12    3 = Rarely or never used
772.  (No) Litigation: Use of third parties offering binding decisions, with or
      without formal court systems (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
    97    . = Missing data
    27    1 = Frequent involvement in litigation by society members
    21    2 = Occasional involvement
    41    3 = Rare or non-involvement


773.  (No) Internal Warfare (Between communities of same society) (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
    101   . = Missing data
     31   1 = Frequent, occurring at least yearly
     14   2 = Common, at least every five years
     10   3 = Occasional, at least every generation
     30   4 = Rare or never
774.  (No) External Warfare (with other societies) (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
    102   . = Missing data
     45   1 = Frequent, occurring at least yearly
     13   2 = Common, at least every five years
      6   3 = Occasional, at least every generation
     20   4 = Rare or never
775.  (Low) Compliance of Individuals with Community Norms and Decisions (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
   100    . = Missing data
    43    1 = High
    31    2 = Moderate
    12    3 = Highly Variable
776.  (Few) Formal Sanctions and Enforcement for Community Decisions (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
    96    . = Missing data
    23    1 = Great sanctioning power available
    32    2 = Some
    35    3 = Little or none
777.  (No) Enforcement Specialists (VAR LABEL REVERSED) (e.g., Police, Tax Collectors)
    97    . = Missing data
    29    1 = Present
    21    2 = Not specialized but done by leaders who do other things as well
    39    3 = Absent, or carried out by social pressure of wider community
778.  (Low) Loyalty to the Local Community (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
   103    . = Missing data
    30    1 = Especially high
    33    2 = High
    14    3 = Moderate
     6    4 = Low
779.  (Low) Loyalty to the Wider Society (in some cases indistinguishable from the
      local community) (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
   102    . = Missing data
    11    1 = Especially high -- uniformly high across groups
    16    2 = High for the most part across groups in the society
    33    3 = Moderate -- some noticeable variation across groups in society
    24    4 = Low -- not terribly salient or rarely important as a concern
780.  (Low) Hostility toward other Societies (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
   112    . = Missing data
    28    1 = Extensive: bitter feelings toward almost all outsiders
    18    2 = High: bitter feelings toward outsiders, but not always
    17    3 = Moderate: sometimes bitter feelings, but much differentiation
    11    4 = Low: little hostility toward outsiders
781.  (Un)Acceptability of Violence toward Members of the local Community (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
   100    . = Missing data
          1 = Valued
     7    2 = Acceptable
    18    3 = Tolerated
    61    4 = Disapproved
782.  (Un)Acceptability of Violence toward Members of the Same Society, but
      outside the Local Community (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
   109    . = Missing data
    12    1 = Valued
    28    2 = Acceptable
    10    3 = Tolerated
    27    4 = Disapproved
783.  (Un)Acceptability of Violence toward people in Other Societies (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
   122    . = Missing data
    39    1 = Valued
    16    2 = Acceptable
     3    3 = Tolerated
     6    4 = Disapproved
784.  (No) Taxation Paid to Community (e.g., in agricultural produce, labor,
      finished goods) (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
   101    . = Missing data
    31    1 = Regular and non-negligible taxes to community
    20    2 = Only in special situations or Modest level
    34    3 = None
785.  (No) Local Political Fission of Dissatisfied Persons (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
   122    . = Missing data
    30    1 = Often move to another community following disputes
    20    2 = Sometimes move to another community following disputes
    14    3 = Rarely or never move to another community following disputes
786.  Adult Mobility
   107    . = Missing data
    18    1 = Adults generally attached to particular communities
              throughout their lives, especially after marriage
    22    2 = Individuals occasionally move to new communities as adults
    39    3 = Movement between communities is quite common for adults
787.  (Low) Contact with Other Societies (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
    99    . = Missing data
    45    1 = Frequent, through trade, warfare, travel, etc.
    28    2 = Occasional but not often
    14    3 = Rare or never
788.  Cross-Cutting Ties: extent to which individuals living in different
      communities of the same society linked together in politically relevant
      ways
    97    . = Missing data
    34    1 = No politically relevant links, formal organizations, or strong
              informal obligations which extend beyond the local community
    30    2 = Some politically relevant ties, but wider society divided
              into some discrete groups not linked through cross-cutting ties
    25    3 = Cross-cutting ties link individuals throughout the society,
              cutting across territorial groups in one or more ways
789.  Type of Cross-Cutting ties: Age Organizations (Grades, Sets) Cutting
      across Communities
    97    . = Missing data
    78    1 = Absent
     5    2 = Present but not politically important
     6    3 = Present and political important
790.  Type of Cross-Cutting ties:  Kinship Organizations cutting across
      Communities
    96    . = Missing data
    23    1 = Absent
    27    2 = Present but not politically important
    40    3 = Present and political important
791.  Type of Cross-Cutting Ties: Moieties cutting across Communities
    97    . = Missing data
    76    1 = Absent
     8    2 = Present but not politically important
     5    3 = Present and political important
792.  Types of Cross-Cutting Ties: Ritual Organizations (Religious, Cult
      Groups) cutting across Communities
    97    . = Missing data
    42    1 = Absent
    27    2 = Present but not politically important
    20    3 = Present and political important
793.  (Low) Female Participation in Public Political Arenas, Relative to Males (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
   106    . = Missing data
     8    1 = High: in some situations equal to or greater than that of men
    27    2 = Significant but not as high as male involvement
    19    3 = Not great but clearly some role for women in public aspects
              of political life
    26    4 = Women generally excluded from public aspects of politics
794.  (Low) Female Participation in Private Political Arenas, Relative to Males (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
   120    . = Missing data
    35    1 = High: in some situations equal to or greater than that of men
    15    2 = Significant but not as high as male involvement
    12    3 = Not great but clearly some role for women in private aspects of
              political life
     4    4 = Women do not seem to get involved in political life in
              private arenas
795.  (Low) Gender differences in Political or Quasi-Political Positions of
      Authority (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
   102    . = Missing data
     8    1 = Women and men eligible for some of the same positions and
              women commonly do so
    18    2 = Women and men eligible for some of the same positions and
              women occasionally do so
     7    3 = Women rarely, if ever, hold some of the same positions
              regardless of rules of eligibility
    51    4 = The same political positions are not open to both women and men
796.  (No) Separate Female Organizations and Positions (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
   117    . = Missing data
    22    1 = Some associations or organizations under exclusive control
              of women
    15    2 = No associations but some positions of authority for which
              only women are eligible
    32    3 = No associations or positions exclusively controlled by women
797.  (Low) Coder Assessment of Data Quality (VAR LABEL REVERSED)
    96    . = Missing data
    14    1 = Especially high -- judgments not difficult to make
    31    2 = Good -- some missing date, that available seemed good
    34    3 = Moderate but acceptable -- a good deal of inference sometimes
              required
    11    4 = Weak for certain variables with much missing data and only
              the most general descriptions for some domains
Personal tools